
Request for Proposal for Audit Services
Inquiries and proposals should be directed to:
Patty Mullally
Chief Finance Director
51½ΦΙδ Inc. 1830 N. Dinuba Blvd. Visalia, CA 93291 (559) 733-5423
General Information
Purpose:
Who may Respond:
Instructions on Proposal Submission:
- Closing submission date: Proposals must be submitted no later than 4:30 p.m. on August 18, 2025
- Inquiries: Inquiries concerning this RFP should be directed to Patty Mullally or Michelle Engel-Silva at (559) 733-5423.
- Conditions of proposal: All costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal responding to this RFP will be the responsibility of the Offeror and will not be reimbursed by 51½ΦΙδ.
- Instructions to prospective contractors:
Your proposal should be submitted electronically to the following website by the due date. Failure to do so may result in premature disclosure of your proposal. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the proposal is received by 51½ΦΙδ. by the date specified above. Late proposals will not be considered.
- Right to reject: 51½ΦΙδ. reserves the right to reject any and all proposals received in response to this RFP. A contract for the accepted proposal will be based upon the factors described in this RFP.
- Small and/or Minority- Owned Businesses: Efforts will be made by 51½ΦΙδ. to utilize small businesses and minority-owned businesses. An Offeror qualifies as a small business firm if it meets the definition of "small business" as established by the Small Business Administration.
- Notification of award: It is expected that a decision about selecting the successful audit firm will be made within three (3) weeks of the closing date for the receipt of proposals.
Upon conclusion of final negotiations with the successful audit firm, all Offerors submitting proposals in response to this Request for Proposal will be informed, in writing, of the name of the successful audit firm.
It is expected that the contract shall be a one-year fixed price contract with options for two additional one-year periods.
Description of Entity and Records to be Audited:
Options:
Specification Schedule
Scope of Financial and Compliance Audit:
Government Audit Standards: Financial statement audits determine (l) whether the financial statements of an audited entity present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows or changes in financial position in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (2) whether the entity has complied with laws and regulations for those transactions and events that may have a material effect on the financial statements.
Description of Programs/Contracts/Grants:
Performance:
Delivery schedule:
The Offeror shall deliver final audit reports to 51½ΦΙδ. 's Audit Committee of the Board of Directors no later than March 31, 2026.
Reports may be submitted earlier than the schedule above. However, if the Offeror fails to make delivery of the audit reports within the time schedule specified herein, or if the Offeror delivers audit reports that do not conform to all of the provisions of this contract, 51½ΦΙδ. may, by written notice of default to the Offeror, terminate the whole or any part of this contract. Under certain extenuating circumstances, the contracting agent may extend this schedule upon written request of the Offeror with sufficient justification.
Price:
Payment:
Progress payments will be allowed to the extent that 51½ΦΙδ. can determine satisfactory progress is being made.
Upon delivery of the copies of the final reports to 51½ΦΙδ. and their acceptance and approval, the Offeror may submit a bill for the balance due on the contract for the audit.
Audit review:
Exit conference:
Workpapers:
- Upon request, the Offeror will provide a copy of the workpapers pertaining to any questioned costs determined in the audit. The workpapers must be concise and provide the basis for the questioned costs as well as an analysis of the problem.
- The workpapers will be retained for at least three years from the end of the audit period.
- The workpapers will be available for examination by authorized representatives of the Cognizant federal or state audit agency, the General Accounting Office, and 51½ΦΙδ.
Confidentiality:
The Offeror agrees to immediately notify, in writing, 51½ΦΙδ. 's authorized representative in the event the Offeror determines or has reason to suspect a breach of this requirement.
AICPA Professional Standards:
- Ethics Interpretation 501(c) (3) β€” Failure to follow standards and/or procedures or other requirements in governmental audits.
- Engagements for audits of government grants, government units, or other recipients of government monies typically require that such audits be in compliance with government audit standards, guides, procedures, statutes, rules, and regulations, in addition to generally accepted auditing standards. If a member has accepted such an engagement, and undertakes an obligation to follow specified government audit standards, guides, procedures, statutes, rules and regulations, in addition to generally accepted auditing standards, he is obligated to follow such requirements
Technical Qualifications
The Offeror, in its proposal, shall, as a minimum, include the following:
Prior Auditing Experience
- The Offeror should describe its prior auditing experience including the names, addresses, contact persons, and telephone numbers of prior organizations audited. Experience should include the following categories:
- Prior experience auditing similar programs funded by (state).
- Prior experience auditing programs financed by the Federal Government.
- Prior experience auditing similar county or local government activities.
- Prior experience auditing nonprofit organizations
- Prior experience auditing
- Prior experience designing and/or installing accounting systems in (type of entity).
- Peer reviews
Organization, size, and structure:
Staff Qualifications:
The Offeror should describe the qualifications of staff to be assigned to the audits. Descriptions should include:
- Audit team makeup
- Overall supervision to be exercised
- Prior experience of the individual audit team members: Only include resumes of staff to be assigned to the audits. Education, position in firm, years and types of experience, continuing professional education, state(s) in which licensed as a CPA, etc. will be considered.
Understanding of Work to be performed:
Certifications:
Proposal Evaluation
Submission of Proposals:
Nonresponsive proposals:
- The proposal is not received in a timely manner in accordance with the terms of this RFP.
- The proposal does not follow the specified format.
- The proposal does not include the Certifications
- The proposal is not adequate to form a judgment by the reviewers that the proposed undertaking would comply with the Government Audit Standards of the U.S. Controller General.
Evaluation:
Evaluation of each proposal will be scored on the following five factors.
Prior experience auditing and/or designing and installing Accounting System Point Range | Points |
---|---|
Prior experience auditing Nonprofit organizations | 0-7 |
Prior experience auditing similar programs funded by State of California | 0-5 |
Prior experience auditing similar programs funded by U.S. Federal Government | 0-5 |
Prior experience auditing similar county or local Government activities | 0-5 |
Prior experience auditing private foundations | 0-5 |
Prior experience designing and/or installing Accounting System for non-profits | 0-3 |
Organization, size, and structure of the Offeror's firm. (Considering size in relation to audits to be performed) | Points |
---|---|
Adequate size of the firm | 0-7 |
Minority/small business | 0-3 |
Qualifications of staff to be assigned to the audits to be performed. This will be determined from rΓ©sumΓ©s submitted. Include education, position in firm, and years and types of experience, continuing professional education, and state(s) in which licensed as a CPA, etc. will be considered. | Points |
---|---|
Audit team makeup | 0-10 |
Overall supervision to be exercised | 0-5 |
Prior experience of the individual audit team members | 0-5 |
Offeror's understanding of work to be performed | Points |
---|---|
Adequate coverage | 0-5 |
Realistic time estimates of each audit step | 0-10 |
Price | 0-25 |
Maximum Points | 100 |
Review process:
51½ΦΙδ. may, at its discretion, request presentations by or meetings with any or all Offerors to clarify or negotiate modifications to the Offerors' proposals.
However, 51½ΦΙδ. reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of the proposals submitted. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms, from both technical and price standpoints, which the Offeror can propose.
51½ΦΙδ. Contemplates award of the contract to the responsible offeror with the highest total points.
Certifications
On behalf of the Offeror:
- The individual signing certifies that he/she is authorized to contract on behalf of the Offeror.
- The individual signing certifies that the Offeror is not involved in any agreement to pay money or other consideration for the execution of this agreement, other than to an employee of the Offeror.
- The individual signing certifies that the prices in this proposal have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition.
- The individual signing certifies that the prices quoted in this proposal have not been knowingly disclosed by the Offeror prior to an award to any other Offeror or potential Offeror.
- The individual signing certifies that there has been no attempt by the Offeror to discourage any potential Offeror from submitting a proposal.
- The individual signing certifies that the Offeror is a properly licensed certified public accountant, or a public accountant licensed on or before (date of licensing).
- The individual signing certifies that the Offeror meets the independence standards of the Government Auditing Standards.
- The individual signing certifies that he/she is aware of and will comply with the GAO Continuing Education Requirement of 80 hours of continuing education every two years; and that 24 hours of the 80 hours education will be in subjects directly related to the government environment and to government auditing for individuals.
- The individual signing certifies that he/she is aware of and will comply with the GAO requirement of an external quality control (peer) review at least once every three years.
- The individual signing certifies that he/she has read and understands the following publications relative to the proposed audits:
- Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book)
- Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200)
- A Guide for Nonprofit Organizations: Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Indirect Cost and other Rates for Grants and Contract with the Department of Health and Human Services
- Audits of Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations (AICPA Audit Guide)
- Audits of Certain Nonprofit Organizations (AICPA Audit Guide) (Note: if the entity is a unit of government, replace 4 β€” 8 above with the following:)
- CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments, including the Common Rule
- Cost Principles for State and Local Governments
- Audits of State and Local Units of Government (Note: The RFP should also list any regulations, publications, for audit guides that are relevant to specific programs to be audited. For example, if a Department of Energy weatherization program is to be audited, the Offeror should be familiar with 10 CFR 600, DOE's administrative requirements, and 10 CFR Part 400, DOE's weatherization program requirements.)
- The individual signing certifies that he/she has read and understands all of the information in this Request for Proposal, including the information on the programs/grants/contracts to be audited.
- The individual signing certifies that the Offeror and any individuals to be assigned to the audits do not have a record of substantiated audit work and has not been debarred or suspended from doing work with any federal, state, or local government. (If the Offeror or any individual to be assigned to the audits has been found in violation of any state or AICPA professional standards, this information must be disclosed.)
Comments powered by